The Lifestream of Jon Moss - tagged with apple http://www.jonmoss.me/feed en-us http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Sweetcron reachjm@googlemail.com HDR Apple Store Covent Garden http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/20901

JonnyMoss

Very impressed with the iPhone 4 camera and the Cam plus app.

]]>
Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:05:00 +0100 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/20901
The new Covent Garden Apple Store http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/20902

JonnyMoss

]]>
Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:03:00 +0100 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/20902
Beautiful Apple design http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/20348

Could you live with something you use, every day, for hours looking hideous? Nope. Neither could I.

Want to accelerate your marketing and get better results?, Free Online Marketing Course

Related posts:Omniwriter – a beautiful app Ommwriter from Herraiz Soto on Vimeo. A simple idea, beautifully... Jonathan Ive talking about design From the excellent documentary film, Objectified. Want to accelerate your... Will we be publishing our own digital magazines on the Apple Tablet? So, tomorrow’s big Apple event is looming, and I’ve suddenly...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

]]>
Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:19:00 +0100 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/20348
Current iPhone 4 homescreen http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/20122

JonnyMoss

]]>
Sun, 04 Jul 2010 12:28:00 +0100 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/20122
Apple’s new iPad advert http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/19387

Nicely done as always. 15 days to go

Related posts:The first iPad TV advert Shown during the oscars, and it looks rather cool!... How Apple should display iPhone apps on iPad .flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; } .flickr-yourcomment {... My iPad thoughts on BBC Radio Lincs Myself and Will Hawkins over at Digital Business were asked...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

]]>
Thu, 13 May 2010 06:33:00 +0100 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/19387
Stephen Fry’s iPad unboxing http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18667

Ok, Im getting excited, and here in the Uk, we don’t even know when we’re getting them! (well, I’ve heard a few rumours, but that’s another story). The iPad reviews and videos are coming in thick and fast now, with the tech / digital / gadget royalty getting their hands on them in the US prior to the public Saturday launch. (Lucky beggars). Here’s a brief unboxing / unpacking video from Mr Fry – I think he was getting rather excited!

Want to accelerate your marketing and get better results?, Free Online Marketing Course

Related posts:My iPad thoughts on BBC Radio Lincs Myself and Will Hawkins over at Digital Business were asked... It’s now an iPad world Disappointment? A let down? Where’s the camera? No flash!... The first iPad TV advert Shown during the oscars, and it looks rather cool!...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

]]>
Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:08:00 +0100 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18667
Investigate Apple's Chinese Supply Chain, Get Assaulted [Apple] http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18174

Apple's corporate headquarters, PR megamachine and primary customer base are in the US. Their products, on the other hand, come directly from Chinese hardware manufacturers. Like Apple, they're good at keeping secrets. Unlike Apple, they're sometimes violent about it.In writing an exposé on Apple's supply chain, Reuters' reporters fleshed out what we already know: There's an immense pressure on companies under contract with Apple not to leak any information about forthcoming products; said companies have shady labor histories; working for one of these companies frankly sounds terrifying. We touched on these problems when Foxconn was accused of driving an employee to suicide over an iPhone prototype leak last year, but at the time, our picture of Foxconn was patched together from a pile of second and third-hand reports, conflicting local news stories, and PR spin. To date, there hasn't been a better illustration of the problem than this

Tipped by a worker outside the Longhua complex that a nearby Foxconn plant was manufacturing parts for Apple too, our correspondent hopped in a taxi for a visit to the facility in Guanlan, which makes products for a range of companies. As he stood on the public road taking photos of the front gate and security checkpoint, a guard shouted. The reporter continued snapping photos before jumping into a waiting taxi. The guard blocked the vehicle and ordered the driver to stop, threatening to strip him of his taxi license. The correspondent got out and insisted he was within his rights as he was on the main road. The guard grabbed his arm. A second guard ran over, and with a crowd of Foxconn workers watching, they tried dragging him into the factory. The reporter asked to be let go. When that didn't happen, he jerked himself free and started walking off. The older guard kicked him in the leg, while the second threatened to hit him again if he moved. A few minutes later, a Foxconn security car came along but the reporter refused to board it. He called the police instead. After the authorities arrived and mediated, the guards apologized and the matter was settled. The reporter left without filing a complaint, though the police gave him the option of doing so. "You're free to do what you want," the policeman explained, "But this is Foxconn and they have a special status here. Please understand."

So, let's get this straight: If you, a reporter, take pictures of the outside of a Foxconn factory, you can dragged, kicked, threatened, and reminded of how ominously "special" Foxconn's relationship with Apple makes them. (PS: Omigod, have you heard about the new iPad!?) For Apple, this could mean two things: That they long ago entered into business with a company that's predisposed to violent enforcement of security policy; or that their extreme demands for secrecy, and extreme value to Foxconn, have driven the company to become this way. In neither situation can you call Apple the culprit. In both, though, they're at the very least silently complicit. [Reuters via Business Insider]

]]>
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:21:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18174
Apple Offering Free Hard Drive Replacements For MacBooks Bought Between 2006 - 2007 [Apple] http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18137

MacBooks bought between 2006 and 2007 could be eligible for a free hard drive replacement, with Apple dodging a guilty admission, stating that "a very small percentage...may fail under certain conditions." If you own a white or black MacBook bought between 2006 and 2007, with either a 1.83GHz, 3Ghz, or 2.16GHz processor and 60GB, 80GB, 100GB, 120GB or 160GB, you may be in luck. Or out of luck—as you have to prove the hard drive actually has failed. The offer is open until August the 15th of this year, or three years after the MacBook was purchased. Now all Apple has to do is address the faulty iMac problem, and we're gold. Oh, and these eight issues with the iPad...[Reg Hardware]

Image credit: TheYoungThousands

]]>
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:51:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18137
Apple locks down iPhone trademark, includes 'electronic games' category http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18083

Patently Apple has sniffed out the latest, and most comprehensive, trademark registration acquired by Apple on the subject of the iPhone and we thought we'd have a peek. Already entitled to use the brand name under international categories 9 (mobile phone and digital audio player) and 38 (electronic data-transmitting device), Apple has now added category 28, which reads shortly and sweetly as a 'handheld unit for playing electronic games.' Before you freak out and start fusing this into your iPhone 4G fantasies, note that Apple filed the claim for this trademark way back in December 2007. So nothing necessarily new on the tech front, but this document provides the broadest brand protection yet -- including the bitten apple graphic alongside the name -- and could strengthen Cupertino's case in its forthcoming battle for the iPad moniker.Apple locks down iPhone trademark, includes 'electronic games' category originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.Permalink TiPb, Patently Apple  |  USPTO  | Email this | Comments

]]>
Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:29:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18083
Apple updates store, offers Aperture - and is this a hint of iPad pricing? http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18023

We're not sure who it is that Apple uses to do its currency conversions, but they don't set a very friendly rate. And that may be bad news for iPad prices - when we get them (updated)(Click the image to see the US pricing for comparison)After a nailbiting few minutes when the Apple Store (online) went down earlier today, and a few people prayed that either Apple would release new MacBooks and/or MacBook Pros and/or prices in the UK for the iPad, it came back instead with Aperture 3.In other words, no price yet for the iPad. But don't go away - there is a story here. Besides the app for professional photographers who want to spruce up their photos. ("With more than 200 new features and enhancements, Aperture 3 is the perfect choice if you're ready to take your photography to the next level." OK, that's nice.)Let's head over to the US store and see how it's priced. Ooh, looky, $199 for the full version, or $99 for the upgrade.And in the UK? The price of the full version is £169, or for the upgrade it's £79. Though of course those are the "international English" versions.How does that work, exactly? What is it about the "international English" versions that mean that they have to cost extra?First, there's the question of how much extra. First, take off VAT at 17.5%: that gives you prices of £144 and £67.Now, the US exchange rate presently says that $1 = £0.603. On that basis, prices of $199 and $99 would translate to £120 and £59.72 respectively. (Please, commenters, don't give us "oh, Apple is hedging against currency fluctuations" as a reason. For the dollar to reach a level where $199 = £144, [corrected] the dollar would have to hit £1 = $1.38 [corrected], which it last hit some time in 1985. And any economist will tell you that the pound is far more likely than the dollar to weaken over the next year* (which would mean that you would get more fewer [thanks, @nomster in comments] dollars per pound; in other words, the exchange rate would move more towards $1 = £2 than towards parity).So clearly we're on the wrong side of this calculation - by a factor of between 18%-20%. (That is, you translate from US$ to UK£ at the exchange rate, and then add 20%, and then add VAT.)First, we can note that this continues the absurd practice by which US companies price stuff in the UK at prices which don't make any sense. (See stories on Apple and Adobe passim.)But secondly it tells us something about what iPad prices might be like. You'll recall that Macworld had a stab at those a while back. It said: "A good rule of thumb is to take the US price, convert it to the UK price using the daily exchange rate, add on the 17.5 per cent VAT, then add on another 7 per cent or so (Steve Jobs said during the iPhone launch that this was simply because "it's just a bit more expensive to do business here… store stuff, ship stuff around".)"However, we've found a better rule of thumb is to take a product on the US store that matches the US price you're looking at, then find the same product on the UK store and see how much it is."OK, but we now prefer to try this "add 20%" rule of thumb. And on that basis the prices for the iPad become...US:Wi-Fi only: 16GB: $499; 32GB: $599; 64GB: $699.Wi-Fi + 3G: 16GB: $629; 32GB: $729; 64GB: $829.OK, so exchanging dollars into pounds ($1 = £.603), adding on the 20%, and then the 17.5% VAT we get:UK:Wi-Fi only: 16GB: £424; 32GB: £509; 32GB: £594. (Guardian estimate.)(Macworld estimate: £388, £510, £591)Wi-Fi + 3G: 16GB: £534; 32GB: £619; 64GB: £705. (Guardian estimate.)(Macworld estimate: £490, £612, £693)Is it just me, or are those a bit eye-watering? It's certainly going to be a lot better for sales if the prices are closer to - or even lower than - the Macworld prices than those ones.What would help a lot, of course, would be if Apple would get on and announce the prices for the UK. But so far it's shown no inclination to do so. Nor, of course, to announce upgraded laptops - despite them being overdue according to the Macrumors buyer's guide (in time order to help the impatient). Oh well.* go and read up about it if you likeAppleiPadCharles Arthurguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

]]>
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:58:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18023
Google Paying Apple More Than $100 Million Annually For iPhone Search Deal [Google] http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18020

The rumor that Apple is building its own search engine "isn't credible," according to a source familiar with Apple's operations.Our source tells us "there's too many options" for search on the market, so there's no reason for Apple to build its own search engine. Another reason Apple might not want to build its own search engine: It's getting over $100 million a year from Google in its revenue share deal, according to our source. For Apple, that's not a lot of money. But, it's enough that it doesn't make sense for Apple to put considerable resources towards building its own Internet search engine. And, if Apple wanted more money or options, there's Microsoft — with Bing and a big checkbook. While Apple isn't going to stomp into search, Apple's deals with Google have become more contentious lately, as the companies are increasingly competing with each other. Our source tells us when Apple first introduced the iPhone, it hammered out its deal for Google Maps in two weeks. When Apple prepared to launch the iPhone 3G with GPS a year later, it was a six-month process "full of acrimony" to get the maps deal finished. Google wanted access to all sorts of data from the maps, but Apple didn't want to give it up, according to this person.

]]>
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:10:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18020
Microsoft: Office For the iPad Is Something That We're Looking At [Unconfirmed] http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18021

An interview with a Microsoft Senior Product Manager opened the door to rumors of an iPad version of Microsoft's Office suite. Let's keep in mind though that the fellow just vaguely hinted that Microsoft is looking into this idea. When asked if Microsoft would be considering an iPad version of Office, Mike Tedesco, Senior Product Manager for WindowsBU explained:

Yeah, it's something that we're looking at. Obviously the announcement (of the iPad) is really fresh and there's nothing to announce or nothing that I can talk to you about today.

Just because Microsoft is "looking at" something doesn't guarantee a product, but I'm still crossing my fingers and hoping that I'll be able to poke that annoying paperclip on an iPad. [T3 via Techmeme]

]]>
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:53:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18021
Is Apple Finally Getting Serious About TV? [Rumor] http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17995

$1 TV shows, down from $2: sounds like a great plan, but is it real? The FT seems to think so, claiming that the changes will hit the iTunes store at the end of April, corresponding with the iPad launch.Apple's current pricing scheme puts most SD TV content at $2 an episode, with HD content coming at a $1 premium. The new plan would likely just move the pricing levels down by a dollar and be done with it. (It would also go a long way to expanding Apple's vision of a digital media dysutopia: In the future, man will feed iTunes one (1) dollar, for which he will be granted a single unit of Apple-Approved Digital entertainment. </scifi>) But the FT doesn't stop there: They also claim that Apple is still actively pursuing a $30 "best of TV" subscription service, which would roll selected content into a bundle, for which users would pay a monthly fee, and that Apple is being careful to avoid linking the Apple TV to discussions about either proposal, because the prospect of people watching downloaded TV on their actual televisions is apparently terrifying to content providers, for some reason. Ha, could Apple care any less about that poor box? So, how would this actually go down? I'd wager that a limited first wave of $1 shows will serve as a sort of pilot program. Once, or if, these shows make up their price decrease with larger download volume, it'll be much easier to convince the rest of the content providers to go along with the new scheme. Got a better theory? Throw it in the comments. [Financial Times]

]]>
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:29:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17995
The Faulty iMac Saga, Chapter 5: The Moment of Truth [Broken] http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17974

The iMac's notorious flickering problem has been solved through a firmware update. And after a few weeks' hiatus, Apple has continued shipping 27-inch iMacs. This may be it.Can You Safely Buy a New iMac Yet? Nope, but you might be able to next week. Why? There are two noted problems with iMacs—the 27-inch models in particular. First is an issue where their screens flicker. Apple released a firmware update for the problem, but it didn't seem to fix it. However, the second firmware update looks to have been more successful. How successful? Combing through about 30 pages of this thread (thanks Kyle), dozens have found the second update successful—and similar threads have come to similar conclusions. A few outliers still exist, but the vast consensus seems to be that the issue is nullified when the update is properly installed. So it looks like the flickering problem is fixed for most users. This is great news—a huge breakthrough in this whole saga. If your iMac is still flickering after the update, call up Apple and demand new hardware. It finally seems safe to say, you're probably in the minority. But the existing, huge question mark is regarding the yellow screens. Are these fixed yet? Apple halted production lines in what we assumed as an attempt to solve the yellow screen problems (among other iMac quirks). Now they're shipping new 27-inch iMacs again. Theoretically, the yellow screens could be behind us. But until customers actually receive and test these iMacs, we don't know if Apple was able to solve whatever problems are going on. Apple most certainly hasn't made claims either way. What Ever Happened With Those Apple Pay-outs We received reports from the UK, and then the US, that Apple was essentially buying back faulty iMacs for 15% over the sticker price. It was until later, however, that we learned the catch. What once looked like a pretty great deal turned out, well, mediocre. The 15% was a flat payback rate that was meant to cover both tax and shipping. We assume it covered purchasing expenses, but a money hand-out it was not. It's also worth mentioning that this deal was handed out sporadically, and I'm not sure it's still being offered to customers at all. Quote of the Week "[Apple] said they can issue me a refund via check that'll come 4-6 weeks. That's nearly $2600 of my money they're going to hold for over 2 months since the day I paid for this messed up computer." Apple Is All In So this is it, the big moment of truth. Without official word, we are forced to interpret the delivery freezes as both a silent admission that there were problems with iMacs and an attempt to fix them. But who knows if Apple actually solved the yellow screens. Especially if the source of the issue is really in the LG panel itself—which some suspect given similar complaints with similar Dell monitors—it's possible that Apple can't cure the jaundice without raising hell down at the factory, or shopping for another supplier. (This problem shouldn't be the consumer's inconvenience, of course.) We won't know until we see the latest iMacs in the wild. We've got a lot of sources—retail/repair spies, plenty of tipsters who are on their third or fourth faulty iMac and, of course, all of you—just waiting to share their replacement experiences. Tip us at submissions@gizmodo.com and join in. Apple, I hope we can put these problems behind us because neither of us wants to see how bad that apple on the table can rot.

]]>
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:20:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17974
The iPad Costs Apple As Little As $229.35 to Build [Apple] http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17977

The $500 16GB, Wi-Fi only iPad costs Apple less than half that to build, according to a recent component breakdown from iSuppli. And for the 64GB 3G iPad, Apple clears nearly $500 in profit. Here's how it breaks down: Apple iPad Estimated Bill-of-Materials and Manufacturing Cost Analysis: This will no doubt be updated once iSuppli and others are able to do a teardown of an actual device, but those estimated profit margins are pretty stunning, particularly on the higher-end models. iSuppli also points out that the 32GB versions of the iPad only cost $30 more to make than their 16GB counterparts, yet retail for $100 more—a good indication that that's where they expect the sweet spot to be in the market. Goes a long way to explaining why Apple's so willing to be flexible on the price, no?[iSuppli]

]]>
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:41:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17977
Apple updates store, offers Aperture - and is this a hint of iPad pricing? http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18018

We're not sure who it is that Apple uses to do its currency conversions, but they don't set a very friendly rate. And that may be bad news for iPad prices - when we get them (updated)(Click the image to see the US pricing for comparison)After a nailbiting few minutes when the Apple Store (online) went down earlier today, and a few people prayed that either Apple would release new MacBooks and/or MacBook Pros and/or prices in the UK for the iPad, it came back instead with Aperture 3.In other words, no price yet for the iPad. But don't go away - there is a story here. Besides the app for professional photographers who want to spruce up their photos. ("With more than 200 new features and enhancements, Aperture 3 is the perfect choice if you're ready to take your photography to the next level." OK, that's nice.)Let's head over to the US store and see how it's priced. Ooh, looky, $199 for the full version, or $99 for the upgrade.And in the UK? The price of the full version is £169, or for the upgrade it's £79. Though of course those are the "international English" versions.How does that work, exactly? What is it about the "international English" versions that mean that they have to cost extra?First, there's the question of how much extra. First, take off VAT at 17.5%: that gives you prices of £144 and £67.Now, the US exchange rate presently says that $1 = £0.603. On that basis, prices of $199 and $99 would translate to £120 and £59.72 respectively. (Please, commenters, don't give us "oh, Apple is hedging against currency fluctuations" as a reason. For the dollar to reach a level where $199 = $144, the dollar would have to hit $1 = £1.38, which it last hit some time in 1985. And any economist will tell you that the pound is far more likely than the dollar to weaken over the next year* (which would mean that you would get more fewer [thanks, @nomster in comments] dollars per pound; in other words, the exchange rate would move more towards $1 = £2 than towards parity).So clearly we're on the wrong side of this calculation - by a factor of between 18%-20%. (That is, you translate from US$ to UK£ at the exchange rate, and then add 20%, and then add VAT.)First, we can note that this continues the absurd practice by which US companies price stuff in the UK at prices which don't make any sense. (See stories on Apple and Adobe passim.)But secondly it tells us something about what iPad prices might be like. You'll recall that Macworld had a stab at those a while back. It said: "A good rule of thumb is to take the US price, convert it to the UK price using the daily exchange rate, add on the 17.5 per cent VAT, then add on another 7 per cent or so (Steve Jobs said during the iPhone launch that this was simply because "it's just a bit more expensive to do business here… store stuff, ship stuff around".)"However, we've found a better rule of thumb is to take a product on the US store that matches the US price you're looking at, then find the same product on the UK store and see how much it is."OK, but we now prefer to try this "add 20%" rule of thumb. And on that basis the prices for the iPad become...US:Wi-Fi only: 16GB: $499; 32GB: $599; 64GB: $699.Wi-Fi + 3G: 16GB: $629; 32GB: $729; 64GB: $829.OK, so exchanging dollars into pounds ($1 = £.603), adding on the 20%, and then the 17.5% VAT we get:UK:Wi-Fi only: 16GB: £424; 32GB: £509; 32GB: £594. (Guardian estimate.)(Macworld estimate: £388, £510, £591)Wi-Fi + 3G: 16GB: £534; 32GB: £619; 64GB: £705. (Guardian estimate.)(Macworld estimate: £490, £612, £693)Is it just me, or are those a bit eye-watering? It's certainly going to be a lot better for sales if the prices are closer to - or even lower than - the Macworld prices than those ones.What would help a lot, of course, would be if Apple would get on and announce the prices for the UK. But so far it's shown no inclination to do so. Nor, of course, to announce upgraded laptops - despite them being overdue according to the Macrumors buyer's guide (in time order to help the impatient). Oh well.* go and read up about it if you likeAppleiPadCharles Arthurguardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

]]>
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:48:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/18018
iMac 27 Shipping Again [Apple] http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17929

After the rumored iMac 27 global shipment halt, reader Adam Pattee has sent us confirmation that his unit—purchased on January 29—is now shipping. Apple says his iMac will arrive on February 16. Did you get a notification too? Write to submissions@gizmodo.com.

]]>
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:19:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17929
Apple Patent Shows A 3D Virtual World For Buying Their Goods In [Apple] http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17927

There was a time, before Avatar, when 3D meant crummy virtual gaming. A recent patent granted to Apple shows they are (or were) considering a 3D virtual Apple Store—a more welcoming way to shop for Apple products. It doesn't sound very "Apple," when they normally favor start minimalism over cheesy big-headed virtual characters, but as you can see from the diagram above, they are obviously considering the idea of a store you can walk through and browse the products in, with the outside elements portrayed by falling rain/sunshine etc. The patent was first filed in 2006 by Apple, so I'm hoping they just got swept up in the Second Life craze and have forgotten all about some naff virtual world where you can exchange 17 green and red apples for the latest Miley Cyrus song. [Patently Apple]

]]>
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:07:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17927
Apple Releases Aperture 3 – Retail Price Is $199, Upgrade Costs $99 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17922

It’s been almost 2 years to the day when Apple released Aperture 2.0, and this morning the company announced that the third iteration of the photo editing and management software is available. Some of the new features include Faces, Places and Brushes, many of which will be familiar to people using iPhoto ‘09. With the new version, Apple makes it easier for people to step up from iPhoto to Aperture, while still providing professional photographers with a powerful program for editing and managing their libraries. Apple says the new software boasts over 200 new features. One of those, Faces, works just like in iPhoto, using face recognition technology to find and organize photos by the people in them. You can view faces across your entire photo library or view just the faces that appear in selected projects. In a new view, Aperture 3 displays faces that have been detected but haven’t yet been named. Places lets you explore photos based on the location they were taken, and like in iPhoto, Places automatically reverse geocodes GPS data into locations. In Aperture 3, you can assign locations by dragging-and-dropping photos onto a map or by using location information from GPS enabled cameras, tracking devices or iPhone photos. Aperture 3 also introduces new tools to refine your photos including Brushes for painting image adjustments onto parts of your photo, and Adjustment Presets for applying professional photo effects. New slideshows let you share your work by weaving together photos, audio, text and HD video. Apple features six pre-designed themes but also lets you choose your own transitions, background, borders and titles, and add your own soundtrack. You can export your slideshows directly to iTunes to take with you on your iPhone or iPod touch. There’s also a social networking element to the new Aperture, as you can publish photographs to online photo sharing sites like Facebook and Flickr, straight from the software client, in addition to the ability to print photo books. The Apple Store is currently still down, but it will be available on there soon, as well as in the company’s own retail stores and Authorized Resellers for a suggested retail price of $199. Existing Aperture users can upgrade for a suggested retail price of $99. A downloadable 30-day trial version is available here. Aperture 3 runs as a 64-bit application on Mac OS X Snow Leopard on Macs with Intel Core 2 Duo processors.

CrunchBase InformationApertureAppleInformation provided by CrunchBase

]]>
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:48:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17922
Apple Aperture 3 Brings a Little Bit of iPhoto to Pro Photos With Faces and Places [Apple] http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17923

It's been a long time coming, but Apple's latest pro photo software, Aperture 3, is here. Apple's claiming over 200 new features, pulling in iPhoto stalwarts like Faces and Places, and new slideshows with HD video. Faces and Places work just like iPhoto, using face detection and tagging, so you can organize photos by people or by where you took them, though now you can actually drag-and-drop photos onto a map. Brushes brings fresh painting effects to Aperture, with 15 Quick Brushes for effects like Dodge and Burn. Also like iPhoto, you can now upload directly to Facebook and Flickr. Though perhaps the most interesting bit from the creator standpoint are slideshows that integrate photos, audio, text and HD video that can be exported to iTunes and work with the iPhone and iPod touch, though we'll see how powerful of a feature it really is. Apple doesn't mention it, but the thing I'm really hoping they added a lot of? Speed. Speed. Speed. Speed. Especially after using Adobe's Lightroom 3 Beta. Since it's fully 64-bit on Snow Leopard, I'm pretty hopeful, actually. It's available today for $200 for the full version, or $100 to upgrade, with a 30-day free trial here.

Apple Releases Aperture 3 New Features Include Faces, Places & Brushes CUPERTINO, Calif., Feb. 9 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — Apple® today introduced Aperture™ 3, the next major release of its powerful photo editing and management software, with over 200 new features including Faces, Places and Brushes. Building on the innovative Faces and Places features introduced in iPhoto® '09, Aperture 3 makes it even easier and faster to organize large photo libraries. Aperture 3 introduces new tools to refine your photos including Brushes for painting image adjustments onto parts of your photo, and Adjustment Presets for applying professional photo effects with just one click. Stunning new slideshows let you share your work by weaving together photos, audio, text and HD video. "Millions of people love using iPhoto to organize, edit and share their digital photos," said Philip Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing. "Aperture 3 is designed for both professionals who edit and manage massive libraries of photos and iPhoto users who want to take their photos further with easy-to-use tools such as Brushes and Adjustment Presets." "Aperture 3 gets it right," said National Geographic photographer, Jim Richardson. "The image editing tools are exactly what I have been asking for, they're so easy to use and give me a level of control that I never even thought possible." "I chose Aperture because it was the most powerful archiving application around, but it's now an unbelievable imaging tool as well," said Bill Frakes, Sports Illustrated staff photographer. "I am beyond impressed with the massive changes made in Aperture 3." Aperture 3 allows you to organize large photo libraries with even more flexibility using Projects and the new Faces and Places. Faces uses face detection and recognition to find and organize your photos by the people in them. You can view faces across your entire photo library or view just the faces that appear in selected projects. In a new view that speeds up the organization process, Aperture 3 displays faces that have been detected but haven't yet been named. Places lets you explore your photos based on where they were taken, and like in iPhoto, Places automatically reverse geocodes GPS data into user-friendly locations. In Aperture 3, you can assign locations by dragging-and-dropping photos onto a map or by using location information from GPS enabled cameras, tracking devices or your iPhone® photos. The new Brushes feature allows you to add professional touches to your photos by simply painting effects onto the image. Aperture 3 includes 15 Quick Brushes that perform the most popular tasks like Dodge, Burn, Polarize and Blur, without the complexity of layers or masks. Brushes can automatically detect edges in your images to let you apply or remove effects exactly where you want them. Aperture 3 includes dozens of Adjustment Presets that apply a specific style or look to the entire image with just a click. You can create your own custom presets or explore the techniques of other photographers by importing theirs. Aperture 3 makes it easy to share your work with stunning slideshows that weave together photos, audio, text and HD video. You can select one of six Apple designed themes or choose your own transitions, background, borders and titles, and even add your own soundtrack. You can export your slideshows directly to iTunes® to take with you on your iPhone or iPod touch®. You can also share photographs as beautiful prints, create custom-designed hardcover books and publish to online photo sharing sites like Facebook and Flickr, right from Aperture 3. Pricing & Availability Aperture 3 is available through the Apple Store® (www.apple.com), Apple's retail stores and Apple Authorized Resellers for a suggested retail price of $199 (US) and existing Aperture users can upgrade for a suggested retail price of $99 (US). A downloadable 30-day trial version is available at http://www.apple.com/aperture/trial. Aperture 3 runs as a 64-bit application on Mac OS® X Snow Leopard® on Macs with Intel Core 2 Duo processors. Full system requirements, online tutorials and more information on Aperture 3 can be found at http://www.apple.com/aperture. Apple ignited the personal computer revolution in the 1970s with the Apple II and reinvented the personal computer in the 1980s with the Macintosh. Today, Apple continues to lead the industry in innovation with its award-winning computers, OS X operating system and iLife and professional applications. Apple is also spearheading the digital media revolution with its iPod portable music and video players and iTunes online store, and has entered the mobile phone market with its revolutionary iPhone. © 2010 Apple Inc. All rights reserved. Apple, the Apple logo, Mac, Mac OS, Macintosh, Aperture, iPhoto, iPhone, iTunes, iPod touch, Apple Store and Snow Leopard are trademarks of Apple. Other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

[Aperture]

]]>
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:30:00 +0000 http://www.jonmoss.me/items/view/17923